FREE SHIPPING on Orders Over US$79
United States

What Is the Difference Between gRPC and REST?

SheldonUpdated at Sep 25th 20241 min read

When designing modern distributed systems and APIs, developers often find themselves choosing between different communication protocols. Two of the most popular choices are gRPC and REST. In this article, we will explore what gRPC and REST are, how they differ, and ultimately, which one might be better for your needs.
What Is REST?
Representational State Transfer (REST) is an architectural style for designing networked applications. RESTful services use standard HTTP methods (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE) to perform operations on resources, which are typically represented in JSON or XML.
Key Features of REST:
HTTP Methods: REST APIs use HTTP methods to perform CRUD operations (Create, Read, Update, Delete) on resources.
Stateless: Each request from a client to server must contain all the information the server needs to fulfill that request, ensuring that each request is independent.
Resource-Based: REST APIs revolve around resources, which are identified by URIs (Uniform Resource Identifiers). Resources can be represented in various formats, though JSON is the most common.
Cacheability: REST APIs can take advantage of HTTP caching mechanisms to improve performance and reduce server load.
What Is gRPC?
gRPC, which stands for Google Remote Procedure Call, is an open-source framework developed by Google for building efficient and high-performance APIs. It uses HTTP/2 as its transport protocol and Protocol Buffers (protobufs) as its interface definition language (IDL).
Key Features of gRPC:
Protocol Buffers: gRPC uses Protocol Buffers (Protobuf) as its Interface Definition Language (IDL). Protobuf allows you to define the structure of your data more compactly and efficiently than JSON.
Performance: Because gRPC utilizes HTTP/2, it offers superior performance, including multiplexing and concurrent streaming.
Language Agnostic: With support for multiple languages such as C++, Java, Python, and Go, gRPC allows interoperability across different programming environments.
Bi-Directional Streaming: gRPC provides the ability to both send and receive data streams simultaneously.
Code Generation: Tools are available to generate client and server code from .proto files, making development more seamless and error-free.
What Is the Difference Between gRPC and REST?
While gRPC and REST are both used for building APIs, they differ significantly in several key areas:
Communication Protocols:
gRPC:
Uses HTTP/2, which supports multiplexing, flow control, header compression, and allows multiple requests and responses over a single connection.
REST:
Typically uses HTTP/1.1, which handles requests sequentially and lacks the advanced features of HTTP/2, making it less efficient for certain high-performance applications.
Data Format:
gRPC:
Utilizes Protocol Buffers, which are more efficient and faster to serialize/deserialize compared to JSON. This binary format reduces the size of the payload and improves performance.
REST:
Primarily uses JSON or XML for data interchange, which are text-based formats. While JSON is human-readable and easier to debug, it is generally larger and slower compared to Protocol Buffers.
Streaming Support:
gRPC:
Has built-in support for various types of streaming (client-side, server-side, and bidirectional), which is beneficial for real-time applications or services requiring continuous data flow.
REST:
Does not natively support streaming. Implementing streaming requires additional workarounds, such as chunked transfers or WebSockets.
Code Generation:
gRPC:
Provides automatic code generation for client and server stubs in multiple languages from service definitions. This streamlines development and ensures consistency across different parts of the application.
REST:
Generally does not include automatic code generation. Developers must manually write code for clients and servers, which can be more time-consuming and error-prone.
Error Handling and Status Codes:
gRPC:
Uses gRPC-specific status codes and error handling mechanisms defined in Protocol Buffers, which may be more precise and structured.
REST:
Relies on standard HTTP status codes to indicate the success or failure of requests, which are well understood but may not cover all use cases as comprehensively as gRPC.
Is gRPC Better than REST?
The answer to whether gRPC is better than REST depends on the use case. gRPC offers superior performance, efficient data serialization, and advanced features such as bidirectional streaming, making it ideal for high-performance applications and microservices architectures. However, REST’s simplicity and widespread adoption make it suitable for web services and public APIs that do not require the additional features offered by gRPC.
When to Choose gRPC
When performance is critical and low-latency communication is required.
For real-time applications needing bidirectional streaming.
When working within a microservices architecture.
For projects requiring strong type enforcement and efficient serialization.
For optimal gRPC performance, consider the S5870-48T6BC switch. It’s designed to handle high-speed network operations, ensuring your gRPC setup operates smoothly and efficiently.
When to Choose REST
For simplicity and ease of use, particularly for web services.
When creating public-facing APIs where broad compatibility is a priority.
For projects where human-readable formats (like JSON) are advantageous.
When the requirements involve straightforward CRUD operations.
Conclusion
gRPC excels in high-performance, low-latency, and streaming capabilities, making it ideal for internal microservices and real-time communication. REST offers greater flexibility, simplicity, and broader client support, making it suitable for public APIs. The choice between gRPC and REST comes down to understanding your project requirements and constraints.